GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
.


GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 3. GQ EMF EF Meter RF Spectrum Power Analyzer
 Mid-High Signal Levels 70-80 mG @ 60-120 Hz
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Shawndominico@gmail.com

USA
2 Posts

Posted - 02/12/2018 :  12:42:46  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
70-80mG @ 60-120 Hz level for long periods of time?

Keekapoo

Edited by - Shawndominico@gmail.com on 02/15/2018 07:04:20
Reply #1

Shawndominico@gmail.com

USA
2 Posts

Posted - 02/14/2018 :  07:42:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
A possible source document.
h**p://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol80/mono80-6E.pdf

5.5 Evaluation
There is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of extremely lowfrequency
magnetic fields in relation to childhood leukaemia.
There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of extremely lowfrequency
magnetic fields in relation to all other cancers.
There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of static electric
or magnetic fields and extremely low-frequency electric fields.
There is inadequate evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of
extremely low-frequency magnetic fields.
No data relevant to the carcinogenicity of static electric or magnetic fields and
extremely low-frequency electric fields in experimental animals were available.
Overall evaluation
Extremely low-frequency magnetic fields are possibly carcinogenic to humans
(Group 2B).
Static electric and magnetic fields and extremely low-frequency electric fields are
not classifiable as to their carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3).

Keekapoo
Go to Top of Page
Reply #2

ZLM

1258 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2018 :  17:04:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
For some information from government site:

https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/
Go to Top of Page
Reply #3

ZLM

1258 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2018 :  17:06:33  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The char from EPA:

EPA EMF Information:

41338 bytes



From US Government National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS),near a power line?

790774 bytes

The example of measurement:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxnb2Hc1kpI
Go to Top of Page
Reply #4

EmfDev

1279 Posts

Posted - 05/18/2018 :  09:40:29  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I found a link that exactly says the safety limit exposure.
https://www.electricsense.com/5029/fcc-safety-limits-for-electric-fields-magnetic-fields-rf-radiation/

it says limit for general public is 27.5 for 30-300 MHz.
Go to Top of Page
Reply #5

bobinski

United Kingdom
14 Posts

Posted - 05/11/2019 :  22:41:52  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Here's a link to over 149 pages of references to scientific studies!
There's loads of evidence for the harm this stuff causes.

https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp
Go to Top of Page
Reply #6

Bill D.

USA
44 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2020 :  09:30:46  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Here is the latest IARC monograph on Non-ionizing Radiation (2013): h**ps://publications.iarc.fr/126
Conclusion (419): There is limited evidence that RF radiation is carcinogenic. RF fields are classified as possibly carcinogenic.

Excellent British site with detailed information on EMF, especially power lines. h**p://www.emfs.info/sources/overhead/summaries/

Go to Top of Page
Reply #7

ihab17

Italy
42 Posts

Posted - 01/05/2021 :  14:56:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Well, I have looked at some of the links you folks provided and some are just misinformed articles with no evidence at all. The first bogus site is this https://www.electricsense.com/5029/fcc-safety-limits-for-electric-fields-magnetic-fields-rf-radiation/

Any non-government and non-scientific evidence-based information should be taken with extreme caution. I'm still looking for official scientific papers to backup the claims I read. Sure, too much EF for too long isn't something anyone would want to live in, but what are the safe limits amd the exposure time to trigger an alert is the fundamental question. I don't like those conspiracy theorists and prefer a scientific paper with data samples and empirical evidence.
My 2 cents

Man's best days are yet those to come

Edited by - ihab17 on 01/07/2021 14:45:58
Go to Top of Page
Reply #8

Damien68

France
305 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2021 :  16:15:13  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I fully agree with you.
and government limits are often taken as a precaution.
there are a lot of dreadful conspiracy theorists who don't mind reversing everything and saying anything using what we call stupid retoriques in order to be able to put water to their mills and sell books .

it would be nice if GQ could do moron detectors.

perhaps they think they want to save the world, but they poison it.
intelligence can only be collective and therefore necessarily accompanied by rules and respect, intelligence is not in fear and intimidation, this is more the business of sect gurus or riot leader

Mastery is acquired by studying, with it everything becomes simple

Edited by - Damien68 on 01/08/2021 08:02:19
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.14 sec. Snitz's Forums 2000