GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum Active Users: / Visits Today:
Highest Active Users:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 2.GQ Geiger Muller Counter
 3 diff. readings, same sample
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

wz

2 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2013 :  05:55:12  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hello, I just recieved my new GMC 300 yesterday. The background readings here are averaging about 20 cpm.

I have an Aladdin mantle lamp, and the mantles are known to be radioactive, so that was the first thing I tested.

The lamp has a mantle but no chimney installed. Itis stored in a closed cabinet.

I opened the cabinet and held the '300 very close to the mantle,soon it was alarming, and after about a munite the reading peaked at 811 cpm, sorta alarming to me.

I then went around my place checking things in my shop and various stone and ceramics and read nothing other than background of around 20 cpm.

Went back about 1 hour later to the cabinet and the max reading of the mantle was 210 cpm.

This morning, still same background reading. I checked the mantle again for a munite or so and the leak reading was just 43 cpm.

Can you explain the different readings of the lamp mantle?

Thanks, Wayne
Reply #1

ZLM

1261 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2013 :  08:07:46  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The distance and the position will affect the result.

The Geiger tube on GMC-300 is close to the lower keys. Try to place this part close to your source should get higher reading.
Go to Top of Page
Reply #2

wz

2 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2013 :  15:30:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The distance and position were the same on all 3 tests, right up against the case directly behind the keys.

Could the turbulence of opening the doors have removed residual accumulated dust or gasses cause a variation of the lamp mantle's emittance?

Just checked the lamp again, 12 hours since last test, got a peak reading of 270 cpm.
Go to Top of Page
Reply #3

ZLM

1261 Posts

Posted - 08/16/2013 :  17:25:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It is possible.

Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.08 sec. Snitz's Forums 2000