GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum


GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 2.GQ Geiger Muller Counter
 SBM-20 vs M4011
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

and_kom

Ukraine
24 Posts

Posted - 09/30/2012 :  01:47:05  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Can anyone confirm that russian tube SMB-20 is more sensitive than m4011 tube?

Young and radioactive

Edited by - and_kom on 09/30/2012 01:51:11
Reply #1

ska

10 Posts

Posted - 09/30/2012 :  06:55:20  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
According to my tests, SBM-20 is actually more sensitive in slightly radioactive object, but I'm still looking into. I'm searching for more slightly radioactive objects.
Go to Top of Page
Reply #2

ZLM

1236 Posts

Posted - 10/02/2012 :  22:05:41  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Both SMB-20 and M4011 are in same sensitivity range.
Go to Top of Page
Reply #3

and_kom

Ukraine
24 Posts

Posted - 10/03/2012 :  02:26:52  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Found some tubes info: https://sites.google.com/site/diygeigercounter/gm-tubes-supported

quote:

SBM-20 - The quintessential Russian tube. Lower priced, and more sensitive to beta and gamma than most. This is still one of my favorite all around beta gamma tubes. The STS-5 is pretty much the same tube and may be cheaper.
M4011 - Glass tube made (new) in China. Claimed to be more sensitive than the SBM-20. Although I once got high readings, it now seems similar to the SMB-20. I'm not overly impressed - especially at it's price. IMO the claims for it's sensitivity are exaggerated.



The comparision shows that SBM-20 is slightly sensitive than m4011.

quote:

Initially, the M4011 appeared to be more sensitive than the SBM-20. However, I couldn't repeat this result. I'm not sure what happened - something with the tube? To rule out any change in the counter, I simply changed tubes to the SBM-20 and repeated the SBM-20 test, which was consistent with the previous results. I have no choice but to revise my previous results with what are now more consistent readings. The tubes operating range is 380-450V, and I ran the tube at 450V for the test above. (In the dark, you can see a faint orange glow inside the tube when it's firing.)


Young and radioactive

Edited by - and_kom on 10/03/2012 02:29:29
Go to Top of Page
Reply #4

ska

10 Posts

Posted - 10/03/2012 :  05:16:55  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The real problem is find a good sbm-20 tube, It's really tricky.
Go to Top of Page
Reply #5

and_kom

Ukraine
24 Posts

Posted - 10/06/2012 :  08:48:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I am from Ukraine (ex. USSR) and it's not a big problem to find SBM-20 there. It costs 10-15$ in average there...
I've got one today. First tests showed it seems to be ok.

Young and radioactive

Edited by - and_kom on 10/06/2012 08:52:50
Go to Top of Page
Reply #6

Nudnik

40 Posts

Posted - 05/21/2015 :  02:40:56  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ska

The real problem is find a good sbm-20 tube, It's really tricky.



GM tubes are not degrading by age. A 50 year old but unused russian tube will still work as specified. You probably need to remove corrosion from the contacts, depends on the storage conditions.

GM tubes degrade by detecting.

under construction
Go to Top of Page
Reply #7

Franglish9265

USA
8 Posts

Posted - 05/25/2019 :  10:46:05  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I recently verified that the SBM-20 outperforms the M4111 tube. I read 500 cpm from my vaseline glass cat paperweight, with an SBM-20 tube, but only got 370 to 400 cpm from the M4111 tube, under the same conditions.
Go to Top of Page
Reply #8

ullix

Germany
391 Posts

Posted - 05/26/2019 :  01:06:40  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
You find a comparison between an SBM20 and a M4011 here:
http://www.gqelectronicsllc.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=4571&SearchTerms=ullix,sbm20,m4011

My Conclusion:
quote:
Overall, the SBM20 has the same background as the M4011, but is 40+% more sensitive to counts as long as the source has a strong beta component. Whether the difference extends to gamma is not known and cannot be told with these experiments.


I think the installation of a SBM20 into a 300 housing, while possible, is not worth the hassle!
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.16 sec. Snitz Forums 2000