GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum Active Users: / Visits Today:
Highest Active Users:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 1.Geiger Counter World Map(www.GMCmap.com)
 EPA Radnet data on GMCmap

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List Spell Checker
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File
Check here to include your profile signature.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
luminus Posted - 06/11/2020 : 17:42:03
I was wondering if GQ would be interested in displaying EPA's Radnet data on GMCmap. I think it is doable but somewhat cumbersome. The data is publicly available at https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.do

I am not yet sure about the deployable stations, but the stationary stations have an RTS DDA-02 Dual Detector, which consists of an alpha/beta detector and a Gamma detector. The Alpha/Beta detector is a silicon detector. The gamma detector is a 2" x 2" Sodium Iodide crystal with a Hamamatsu R1306 photomultiplier. So the gamma detector is a scintillation counter, which means that the Radnet stations can sense almost every single gamma ray photon being emitted from radioactive particles trapped in its air filter.

I don't understand why there is no alpha/beta data on the EPA's website. So let's focus on the gamma-ray counts coming from the scintillator. Their scintillator has the following operational characteristics:

energy range: 70 keV to 2.5 MeV
sensitivity: 960 cpm/uR/h (count per minute to microRoentgen per hour) (960000 cpm/mR/h)
maximum working range: 5000 uR/h (5 mR/h)

That means that, with a background radiation of 0.025 mR/h, it will detect 24000 cpm, as opposed to a SBM-20, which will detect 33 cpm (22 cps/mR/h x 60 seconds per minute x 0.025 mR/h).

Since radnet data is more sensitive, it will need to be converted. Also, since count data is available per energy range, it will have to be added up. So, after adding it up, I suggest dividing the result by, say, 800 to get a count equivalent to the sensitivity of a geiger-counter.

Finally, take into account that each radnet station makes its count per minute data available every hour, but spread accross nine energy ranges, as mentioned earlier. By the way, the corresponding energy ranges per channel are:

2: 100-200 keV
3: 200-400 keV
4: 400-600 keV
5: 600-800 keV
6: 800-1000 keV
7: 1000-1400 keV
8: 1400-1800 keV
9: 1800-2200 keV
10: 2200-2800 keV

So, what do you think?

1   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
EmfDev Posted - 06/12/2020 : 08:41:47
Hi luminus, that is a good idea. We will discuss this and see if it is possible.

GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.05 sec. Snitz's Forums 2000